Legal Opinion

Wolf v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1950No. 48507Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiff sues for the 50 per centum extra compensation to which he says he is entitled under section 18 of the Act of June 16, 1942 (56 Stat. 359, 368), because, pursuant to “orders of competent authority,” he was “required to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights.”

Defendant admits that he did participate in aerial flights regularly and frequently pursuant to orders of competent authority. This brings plaintiff within the scope of our decision in William W. Ford v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 174, wherein we held plaintiff was entitled to the 50 per centum extra compensation.

D…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API