Hooper v. Farmers' Union Warehouse Co.

■ ANDERSON, O. J.

Defendants’ plea 7 is rather difficult to understand. It is somewhat of a hybrid. It sets up specifically certain facts showing that plaintiff had no title, or an inferior one, to one of the defendants, Broyles, and which said facts were provable under the general issue. It then assumes the nature of an interpleader by setting out rival claimants to the cotton and praying that they be made parties and.all of whom were already parties except Amos, who subsequently voluntarily came in by counsel. We may concede that said plea 7 was subject to an appropriate demurrer, but think…