Legal Opinion

Conant v. Wills

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided May 15, 1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[Action at law by Conant against Wills and Bradley.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is an action of assumpsit on a promissory note. The defendants plead non assumpsit, and also that the note was assigned by Conant, the plaintiff, to White. The jury having been sworn, the note was offered in evidence. The defendants proved that the note was indorsed in blank, and filled up to White in his hand writing; but this indorsement is now struck out. This was done since the commencement of this suit. The declaration describes Conant of the city of New York, generally; but the note describes him of Pearl street, New York. For this variance, the defendants’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barbarin v. DanielsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. PittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API