Martin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. April 7, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtBeoyles, P. J.
1. Complaint is made of the following excerpt from the charge of the court: “The State insists it has proven certain incriminating statements on the part of the defendant that connect him with the manufacture of this liquor. Look and see whether such statements were made, and, if made, whether they amount to incriminating admissions upon his part, and, if you find they do, you may take into consideration any incriminating admission made by the defendant, together with all other testimony in the case, to aid you in any way in determining whether or not the defendant is guilty, whether he is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Weldon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smithwick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945