Legal Opinion

State v. Webster

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1995No. 94-1269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

hPER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned in State v. Mouton, 94-1074 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/12/95); 653 So.2d 1360, defense counsel’s Motion to Withdraw is denied and the Anders brief filed with this court by defense counsel is rejected and ordered stricken. In view of our treatment of the Anders brief, defendant’s pro se brief is likewise ordered stricken and the permission previously granted the defendant to proceed pro se is revoked. See Local Rules of the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Internal Rule 4. We hereby order the defendant’s pro se brief be forwarded to defense counsel for consideration.

C…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WebsterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API