Henry Grady Hotel Co. v. Sturgis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
(After stating the foregoing' facts.). This is a common-law action based not upon one act of negligence, but upon a series of acts, a combination of which allegedly caused the injury complained of. It will not be necessary to examine all the acts of ■ negligence. We shall put our finger on one alleged act which-breaks-the chain. When the chain is broken the question whether the remaining acts of negligence proximately caused the injury is one 'of ■ speculation and conjecture and falls within the provisions of the Code, § 105-2008, which provides: “If the damages are only the imaginary or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seibel v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Belding v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Bennett Drug Stores Inc. v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sutter v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Carr v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Keaton v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Eschen v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Hall v. BudagherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.