Legal Opinion

Henry Grady Hotel Co. v. Sturgis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1943No. 30230PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

(After stating the foregoing' facts.). This is a common-law action based not upon one act of negligence, but upon a series of acts, a combination of which allegedly caused the injury complained of. It will not be necessary to examine all the acts of ■ negligence. We shall put our finger on one alleged act which-breaks-the chain. When the chain is broken the question whether the remaining acts of negligence proximately caused the injury is one 'of ■ speculation and conjecture and falls within the provisions of the Code, § 105-2008, which provides: “If the damages are only the imaginary or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seibel v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Belding v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Bennett Drug Stores Inc. v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sutter v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Carr v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Keaton v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Eschen v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Hall v. BudagherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API