Roose v. Gove

On Rehearing.

Further consideration of the case has not changed our conclusion. In the Illinois cases cited, expressions are found which certainly support the view that plaintiff could not.raise the question respecting the validity of the judgment under which Bergland redeemed. In addition we now cite Pearson v. Pearson, 131 Ill. 464, in which it was held (quoting the syllabus):

*525‘ ‘ It matters not whether a party has the right to redeem from a sheriff’s sale of land as a judgment creditor or not, if the purchaser at such sale accepts the redemption money. Such acceptance terminates all the…