Bertram v. Wilbur
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The deed of the collector of taxes under which Wilbur, who has entered into possession, claims title to the premises described in the bill of complaint was invalid. The assessments to the George Blanchard heirs who appeared of record as owners of the property, was lawfully levied. But, while the deed recites that demand for payment was made on them, the statute then in force required the collector to state the “ name of the person on whom the demand . . . was made.” St. 1909, c. 490, Part II, §§ 14, 44. Conners v. Lowell, 209 Mass. 111, 118. The ruling of the presiding judge that the deed was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Sawyer v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Stewart v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Sunter v. SunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Streeter v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- O'Connell v. EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Pass v. Town of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976