Legal Opinion
Carter v. Octapharma Plasma Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 7, 2025No. 4:24-cv-02110Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 07, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION § Matthew R. Carter, § § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 4:24-cv-02110 v. § § Octapharma Plasma, Inc., § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM, RECOMMENDATION, AND ORDER Two motions are pending, one filed by each side. Defendant Octapharma Plasma, Inc. (“Octapharma”) filed a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff Matthew Carter’s Title VII claims. See Dkt. 47. Because Carter did not respond, the motion is deemed unopposed. See S.D. Tex. L.R. 7.2. For his part, Carter filed a motion to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist v. Louisiana, Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Brown v. City of Houston, TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Constance Westfall v. Jose LunaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Kathy Dyer v. City of Mesquite TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.