Legal Opinion

Kyseth v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1978No. 38635PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Movant (hereafter defendant) has appealed the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. He had pleaded guilty to possession of a Schedule II controlled substance and on January 9, 1976 was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Defendant then filed his 27.26 motion which was denied. This appeal followed.

We note that a stipulation filed here by defendant’s and the state’s counsel declares that on September 2, 1977 defendant’s sentence was commuted by the Governor of Missouri and defendant has now been discharged from confinement.

Relief under Rule 27.26 is limited to prisoners…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API