Legal Opinion

United States v. Timothy Grayson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2013No. 12-1113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Grayson appeals his sentence after receiving an enhancement for a prior Michigan state conviction for “maintaining a drug house.” He maintains that the state crime does not qualify as a “prior felony drug offense” under 21 U.S.C. § 802(44), which defines the enhancement as “an offense that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year under any law of the United States or of a State or foreign country that prohibits or restricts conduct relating to narcotic drugs, marihuana, anabolic steroids, or depressant or stimulant substances” (emphasis…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Burgess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LeeAnn Brock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. JOHNSON v. WATSONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  3. KELSO v. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. O'NEAL v. KRUEGERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API