Kuptz v. State

I concur in the judgment only. Without explaining all of the reasons I do so, since such would avail nothing but provide tedium, I feel obliged to elaborate with respect to Division 4 of the majority opinion. It deals with Enumerations of Error numbers 6, 7, and 18.

Number 6 claims that the court erred in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the accusation based upon an inconsistency between the offense charged on the ticket and that charged in the accusation.

The traffic citation apparently charged defendant with violating subsection (a) (1) of OCGA § 40-6-391 only. Although the citation is…