Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Meyer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

To settle this action (for fraudulent conspiracy) which had been brought, in 1939, by plaintiff’s testator-Schenck against defendants and was then pending untried, a written agreement was entered into in 1940, whereby defendants paid plaintiff’s testator $20,000, and promised to pay him $180,000 more in installments. As security for those deferred payments, defendants agreed to, and did, transfer to a trustee, title to, and possession of, shares of stock and other property belonging to defendants. The trustee chosen for this purpose by the parties was one of the attorneys then representing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  2. Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Torrey v. Bank of OrleansNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  4. Morris v. . Windsor Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Bryan v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wisnouse v. TelseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Perkins v. MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API