Legal Opinion
In re Nash
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New *85York by the Fourth Judicial Department on April 3, 1968 under the name of George Winston Nash. At all times relevant herein, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
On May 17, 1989, respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges alleging that he had engaged in professional misconduct during the course of his representation of Aurica Foca-Rodi in connection with her divorce from her husband George Foca-Rodi. Specifically, respondent was charged with…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re BailyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
4Cited by9 opinions
- In re CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re BerglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re AdlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.