Legal Opinion
Flowers v. Naiman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 1, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00618Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RAHSHEDA FLOWERS, * Plaintiff v. * CIVIL NO. JKB-19-0618 BALTAX 2017, LLC, et al., * Defendants * x x xe * * * * x MEMORANDUM Rahsheda Flowers (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants Aaron Naiman (“Mr. Naiman”), Naiman & Naiman, P.A. (“Naiman Firm”), and Baltax 2017, LLC (“Baltax’’) alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,
15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seg., and the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act, Md. Code. Ann., Com. Law. § 14-201, ef seg. Plaintiffs claims relate to Defendants’ attempt to foreclose Plaintiff's…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Patrick Booker v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Stewart v. BiermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.