Legal Opinion
Rush v. Wienstein
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 11, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00073Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO CLINTON RUSH, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00073-REB Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE ADREW D. WIENSTEIN; DONALD HEIDA; and TO AMEND COMPLAINT JANET MURAKAMI, (Dkt. 55) Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO POST STATE BOND (Dkt. 58) DFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REQUEST COURT TO ORDER EXAMINATION CONCERNING COMPETENCY OF PLAINTIFF (Dkt. 61) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL (Dkt. 62) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 74) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL (Dkt. 75) Pending before the Court are six motions:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Allied Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of KootenaiIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Pauls v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011