Legal Opinion

Duracote Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 82-226PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Goodyear appeals to this court and questions the propriety of the remittitur ordered by the court of appeals. Duracote cross-appeals, challenging the holdings of the court of appeals regarding interest and “lost profits” and that court’s striking of Duracote’s cross-assignments of error. We consider the issues of interest and “lost profits” first.

I

Duracote contends that its interest and “lost profits” are consequential damages. Professors White and Summers have observed that U.C.C. 2-715(2), which the General Assembly enacted as R.C. 1302.89(B), “imposes *162two restrictions on the recovery of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Chester Park Co. v. SchulteOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Larrissey v. Norwalk Truck Lines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hartley v. Berlin-Milan Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Bobb Forest Products, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Howard v. WillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API