Legal Opinion

Jaime Lazo v. Robert Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2021No. 14-73182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAIME LAZO, AKA Jaime Lazo No. 14-73182 Venegas, Petitioner, Agency No. A012-666-503 v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting OPINION Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 7, 2020* Pasadena, California Filed February 26, 2021 Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Gary S. Katzmann, ** Judge. Opinion by Judge Collins * The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jorge Romero-Millan v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Jairo Bucio Rosales v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. Milton Jimenez (A-246-060-652) v. Warden of the California City Detention CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
  4. Noah Loki v. Warden of the California City Detention CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API