Legal Opinion

People v. Castillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, as the evidence at the suppression hearing permitted the Supreme Court to infer that the police officers who stopped the defendant’s vehicle had reasonable suspicion to do so based on the information that they had received minutes earlier from a radio transmission made by another officer (see People v Coleman, 62 AD3d 810, 810-811 [2009]; People v Williams, 52 AD3d 208 [2008]; People v Gonzalez, 50 AD3d 527 [2008]). Dillon, J.E, Lott,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CerutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. DunbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API