Legal Opinion

Friends of Fiery Gizzard v. Farmers Home Administration

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 6, 1994No. 3-94-0620PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, District Judge.

On September 29, 1994, this Court ruled from the bench, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The Court reserved the right to supplement its ruling with a memorandum opinion, and in accordance with that reservation, supplements its ruling with the following memorandum.

I

In a motion for a preliminary injunction, four factors should be considered. First, and most important for our purposes, is the likelihood of success on the merits. Next, the court should consider the probability of irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Environmental Defense Fund v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. William Cronin v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liddle v. Corps of Engineers of the United States ArmyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API