Graves v. Rayle

Under the peculiar circumstances of' this-case, we think the Court should have continued the cause.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, etc.

Note.—The motion for a continuance was based upon an affidavit of G. D. Murray, containing, in substance, this statement: That, at the request of the plaintiff’s attorney and Gapt. Harrison, the- late attorney of the defendant (the appellant), he appeared for the defendant in this action, and that he was informed, and believed, that Graves knew nothing of Gapt. Harrison's absence from home, or that there existed any necessity for the…