Legal Opinion

United States v. 154 Manley Road

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 30, 1996No. 96-1170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The government appeals from a decision of the district court dismissing its civil forfeiture claim as violative of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. United States v. 154 Manley Rd., 908 F.Supp. 1070, 1083 (D.R.I.1995). The parties agree, and we are likewise persuaded, that the judgment below must be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Ursery, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2135, 135 L.Ed.2d 549 (1996) (holding that in rem civil forfeitures under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) are neither “punishment” nor criminal for purposes of the Double Jeopardy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. One Parcel of Real PropertyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With BuildingsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API