Franklin v. Healthsource of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice
The majority’s opinion abolishes the precedent established only three years ago in Higginbotham v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 312 Ark. 199, 849 S.W.2d 464 (1993), dissolves the legal distinction between equitable and conventional subrogation, and disregards the well-established doctrine in Arkansas that the parties to an insurance contract are free to determine the terms of their agreement. For these reasons, I must respectfully dissent.
First, the majority’s opinion overrules the well-reasoned precedent we established only three years ago in Higginbotham. This court has consistently…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.