Baughman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge McGinley,
Paul Baughman (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee denying his petition for reinstatement of workmens compensation benefits.
Claimant was employed as a bulldozer operator for Respondent, Laurel Environmental Services, Inc., (Employer) when the bulldozer he was operating hit a rock causing Claimant to strike his head on an iron bar in the roof of the vehicle. Claimant suffered a black eye and required stitches to close a head wound. Claimant was paid compensation from November 17,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Venanzio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Economy Decorators, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- D. P. "Herk" Zimmerman, Jr., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Himes)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kear v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Harmar Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Wells-Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Goodwill Industries of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Reilly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990