Partridge v. Michigan Mutual Windstorm Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentNorth, J.
Plaintiffs’ rights and defendant’s liability are fixed by the terms of their contract, so the controlling consideration is determination of the contract provisions. Justice Clark interprets their contractual relation as one which does not provide that their respective rights and liabilities are subject to subsequent changes in defendant’s by-laws. In this I cannot agree. This policy expressly provides that plaintiffs became members of the mutual defendant company “according to the charter and by-laws.” The charter and by-laws are printed as a part of the policy. Article 12 of the charter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Becker v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Borgards v. Farmers' Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wineland v. Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Hutchinson v. Supreme Tent of Knights of Maccabees of the WorldNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Brown v. Great Camp Knights of Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.