Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Board of Regents v. Livingston
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 17, 2005No. 100,271PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge:
¶ 1 In this action to recover on a defaulted student loan, Appellant, Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma (University), appeals from the trial court’s judgment that its claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
¶ 2 University filed its Petition on May 14, 2002. The Petition alleged Appellee, Matthew Livingston (Livingston), and Defendant, Laurie Defrancesco, “executed and delivered to [University] a promissory note” and “did not pay said note in accordance with the terms thereof.”1 Livingston, in his Answer, specifically denied University’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Oklahoma City Municipal Improvement Authority v. HTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Thompson v. InmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Student Loan Authority v. AkersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Opinion No. (2009), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2009
- State Ex Rel. Board of Regents v. LivingstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005