Clive Charles Thomas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentKozinski, Circuit Judge
“[A]nyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays -within the bounds of his authority.” So the Supreme Court told us half a century ago in Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384, 68 S.Ct. 1, 3, 92 L.Ed. 10 (1947). In an opinion likely to have extremely serious and far-reaching consequences, the majority today cuts the core out of- Merrill and lays waste the principle that the government is bound by its agents only if they act within the scope of their authority.
The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.