Robinson v. State of NJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these three cases challenge the constitutionality of the provisions of the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq. (the Act), which permit public employers to withhold and majority union representatives to receive representation fees assessed against employees who are not members of the union. It is now necessary to determine whether additional preliminary injunctive relief must be granted.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In April 1982 plaintiffs in the Robinson and Antonacci cases (now consolidated) filed their complaints. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hogge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Rene Bloch and Hector RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robinson v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Board of Educ. of Town of BoontonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Robinson v. New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- No. 85-5669Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Robinson v. New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States Court of Appeals, Third CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984