Legal Opinion

Matter of Wollan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1986No. CX-86-732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Appellants Bruce Wollan and the Minnesota Department of Human Services seek review of a March 25 judgment, entered pursuant to a March 19 order of the trial court. The court interpreted the rights of Barbara Nash to participate in the special review board hearing process concerning the placement of her brother, Bruce Wollan, on pass-eligible status.

The trial court found Nash is an “interested person” as defined by statute, and Wollan urges reversal of that finding. Even if Nash is an “interested person,” Wollan argues her only right is to notice of, and attendance at,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Hennepin v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Matter of MortonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re HeflerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nash v. WollanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API