Legal Opinion
Hardy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided February 13, 2008No. 10-07-00061-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
Appellants Emily Hardy and Hiram Myers engaged in an anti-war protest near President George W. Bush’s ranch that included erecting a small tent in an off-road bar ditch. After disobeying an officer’s order to move and remove the tent, both were arrested and convicted 1 under Texas Penal Code section 42.03, 2 which prohibits the obstruction of a highway or passageway and the disobedience of an order to move or remove an obstruction. Hardy and Myers complain of the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, as well as the constitutional application…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Morrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Haye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Hardy, Emily Virginia and Myers, Hiram K.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Hardy, Emily Virginia and Myers, Hiram K.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009