Legal Opinion

McEnroy v. St. Meinrad School of Theology

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1999No. 74A01-9803-CV-123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge

Appellant-Plaintiff Dr. Carmel McEnroy (“Dr. McEnroy”) filed an action against St. Meinrad School of Theology, Reverend Timothy Sweeney, and Reverend Eugene Hensell (collectively referred to as “Defendants”), asserting breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations and breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that resolution of this action would excessively entangle the court in religious matters in violation of the First…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. I.C.C. Protective Coatings, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Barrington Management Co. v. Paul E. Draper Family Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stewart v. Kingsley Terrace Church of Christ, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Ballaban v. Bloomington Jewish Community, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Smyrniotis v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Indiana Area Foundation of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API