Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lynch v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1956No. 34451Published

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

Fortunately the operative facts are not in dispute.

Nor is this court concerned with the relative qualifications of the relator and Frank W. Story, the present appointee, or with the relative merits of the statutory and the charter methods of appointing a chief of police.

The sole question before the court is one of law. Did the people of the city of Cleveland possess the political power to amend their charter and choose their own method for selecting their own chief of police other than from a civil service eligible list?

The respondents rely on the following provisions of Sections 3 and 7 of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lapolla ex Youngstown v. DavisMahoning County Court of Common Pleas · 1948
  2. Lapolla v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API