Legal Opinion

Hale v. Andrews

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Oircuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. • Abthüb A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

This suit was commenced by appellee against appellant, before a justice of the peace, to recover the value of one-half of a certain division fence.

The court below rendered judgment for appellee for the value of one-half of the fence, as assessed by the fence viewers, and also for accruing interest thereon, and the costs of the viewers—in all §84.90.

This judgment, in our opinion, was erroneous, and cannot be sustained.

Appellee’s claim is based on the award of the fence viewers, and, inasmuch as their jurisdiction is exceptional and limited, it can only be upheld to the extent it affirmatively…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClay v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Pickerell v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Scott v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Kibbat v. ClokeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  5. Merritt v. SummersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API