Legal Opinion

Triffin v. Janssen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1997No. 01023 and 01181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Herein, the parties appeal and cross-appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which sua sponte imposed sanctions against both parties. We reverse.

This case arises out of a legal malpractice action which Robert J. Triffin (hereinafter “plaintiff’) brought against Henry H. Janssen and. Rapp, White, Janssen & German, Ltd. (hereinafter “defendants”). The record reveals the following facts and procedural history as set forth in the opinion of the trial court:

Defendants served interrogatories upon Plaintiff as well as a request for the production of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Feingold v. Philadelphia National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Novack v. NovackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Kirsch v. PARKING AUTH. OF NEW CASTLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephens v. MessickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Butler v. S & S PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Freidenbloom v. WeyantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Schwartzberg v. GrecoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Schmidt, R. v. LeBoon, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API