Legal Opinion
Williams v. Birkett
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 26, 2010No. Civil 2:07-CV-15376PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND UNCONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
Murad Williams, (“petitioner”), has sought a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, filed both pro se and by attorneys Natasha Webster and Loren Khogali of the Federal Defenders’ Office, petitioner challenges the revocation of his probation for his conviction for unarmed robbery, M.C.L.A. 750.530.
After reviewing the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Williams v. BirkettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012