Baker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
Under an indictment charging him with the offense of grand larceny, the appellant was convicted of the crime of petit larceny and from the judgment thereof he brings this appeal.
The sole ground relied upon for reversal is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. By its proof the Commonwealth established these facts: On a Saturday night in the month of September, 1925, W. B. Tate was compelled on account of a punctured tire to park his automobile he was then driving in a barn lot belonging to a Mr. Henry Bicknell. On the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deaton, Haddix and White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Winchester v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davidson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Abshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Phelps v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Wheeler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Pengleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943