Legal Opinion

Baker v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 1, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

Under an indictment charging him with the offense of grand larceny, the appellant was convicted of the crime of petit larceny and from the judgment thereof he brings this appeal.

The sole ground relied upon for reversal is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict. By its proof the Commonwealth established these facts: On a Saturday night in the month of September, 1925, W. B. Tate was compelled on account of a punctured tire to park his automobile he was then driving in a barn lot belonging to a Mr. Henry Bicknell. On the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deaton, Haddix and White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Winchester v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davidson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Abshire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Phelps v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Wheeler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Pengleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API