Legal Opinion
Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corp. v. Van Brackle Enterprises, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*602OPINION OF THE COURT
Karla Moskowitz, J.
In this breach of contract action, defendants move to dismiss the complaint (motion sequence No. 001). The court grants this motion for the following reasons.
Background
On June 28, 2001, plaintiff Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corporation (UMEZ) loaned codefendant Van Brackle Enterprises, Inc. (VBE), doing business as Miksu Cosmetics, $100,000, pursuant to the terms of a “Loan and Security Agreement.” (See notice of motion, exhibit F [A].) Codefendant Susan Van Brackle signed the loan as VBE’s vice-president and secretary and also signed a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Susan Judd v. Lawrence Wolfe, Susan Judd, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Morse Shoe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In Re MadajCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Watson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- In Re CruzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re PalumboUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2016