Husk v. Adelman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Adelman, the legal parent of child, G, appeals a judgment awarding Husk (Adelman’s former partner) visitation with G. The court determined that Husk had established an “ongoing personal relationship” with G and ordered visitation as allowed by ORS 109.119.1 We write to address Adelman’s first two assignments of error, challenging the visitation plan, and reject Adelman’s third assignment of error, challenging the court’s award of attorney fees to Husk, without written discussion. As explained below, we affirm the visitation plan, but reverse the portion of the judgment that required Adelman…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. J. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Noriega v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. A. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Rosemarie P. v. Kelly B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- McGeehan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024