Legal Opinion
County Commissioners of Howard County v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 5, 1924PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
-D’iggus, J.,.delivered the opinion of the Court.
Under the provisions contained in chapter 217 of the Acts of 1910, commonly referred to as the Shoemaker Road Law, the County 'Commissioners- of Howard County, the appellants, on December 1st, 1916, entered into a written contract with the Amiesite and Stone Company for the construction or improvement of a road located in Howard County, known as Mike’s Quarter Road, between Lowndes’ Entrance and Mike’s Quarter, a distance of about three and seventy-four hundredths miles, with a substance known as amiesite.
The original contract- was No. 453, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Regents of the University of Maryland v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1838
- Mayor of Balto. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
- Mayor of Baltimore v. EschbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ritchmount Partnership v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Gontrum v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Eastern Diversified Properties, Inc. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Patuxent Oil Co. v. County Commissioners of Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.