Legal Opinion
Admiral Financial Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 10, 2002No. 93-489CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the claims of Intervenor-Plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), is GRANTED. The FDIC’s claims fail to satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and are untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2501. This Opinion confirms the Court’s oral ruling of December 18, 2001.
I. Standing/Justiciability
The Court finds that the FDIC presents claims of a non-justiciable nature. As a result, the FDIC lacks standing to intervene in this matter under the standards set forth in Landmark Land Co. v. United States, 256 F.3d 1365 (Fed.Cir.2001), reh’g…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Nicholas J. Janakes, on Behalf of Himself and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Admiral Financial Corporation, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Admiral Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.