Legal Opinion

Licari v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered June 10, 1996, which found respondents’ determination respecting petitioner’s retirement benefits arbitrary and capricious and remanded the matter to New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS) for further consideration, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the application denied and the petition dismissed.

During his employment as a foreman with the Bureau of Water Supply, Department of Water Resources, petitioner was assigned to the Upstate Watershed area and inhabited a house owned by the City of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tommy v. Department of Consumer AffairsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Matter of Tommy & Tina, Inc. v. Dep't of Consumer Affairs of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Coffey v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Coffey v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Bifulco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API