Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ivey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 26, 2002No. A02A0933Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

Because I do not believe the trial judge manifestly abused his discretion in not excusing for cause juror Konkol, I respectfully dissent.

In response to the first statutory qualification question asked by the court pursuant to OCGA § 15-12-164 (a), i.e., had the jurors “formed and expressed any opinion in regard to the guilt or innocence of the accused,” Konkol responded that “I may be prejudiced because I am a victim of an armed robbery.” That she had not formed or expressed any opinion in regard to Ivey’s guilt or innocence, the. crux of the inquiry, was affirmed when Konkol responded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kim v. WallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Speed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Walls v. KimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Cohen v. BaxterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Daniel v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API