Legal Opinion
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 26, 2009No. 94-522CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POST-TRIAL OPINION ON DAMAGES
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This Winstar-related ease comes before the Court after a trial on damages. In an earlier decision addressing liability, the Court determined that Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiff, First Annapolis Bancorp (“Bancorp”), by enacting the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) and enforcing new capital standards. First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. 263 (2007).1 At issue here is whether, in light of the breach, Plaintiff may re*768cover the capital invested in the thrift under a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Greenhill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010