& SC14-2106 Thomas Bevel v. State of Florida and Thomas Bevel v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLawson, J.
I concur with the majority’s decision to vacate Bevel’s death sentence for the Stringfield murder and remand for a- new penalty phase based upon, Hurst error that is not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See Okafor v. State, No. SC15-2136, slip op. at 15, — So.3d —, —, 2017 WL *11952481266. (Fla. June 8, 2017) (Lawson, J., concurring specially). However, I- would not grant Bevel a new penalty phase for the Sims' murder because, as explained in Justice Canady’s concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion, Bevel’s counsel was not ineffective during the penalty phase.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bessman Okafor v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017