Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Weinberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
This is an action brought by a judgment creditor to set aside an assignment by the defendant Abraham Weinberg to Gussie Weinberg, his wife, of certain disability income payments due under policies of life insurance issued on the life of Abraham Weinberg. Gussie Weinberg is named as beneficiary in each of the policies.
During the year 1931, Abraham Weinberg was engaged in the fruit business with one Abraham Ackman as his copartner. To recover for merchandise sold and delivered to the copartnership between the 19th and 22d days of October, 1931, the plaintiff, on *630April 12, 1932, instituted an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Addiss v. SeligNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kerker v. . LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Donahue v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Chase National Bank v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Lion Credit Union v. GutmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Samuels v. QuartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Horowitz v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re RechtmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- United States v. BehrensDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
- In re the Estate of LaundreeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.