Legal Opinion

Scott Maziar, Respondent/cross-app v. Department Of Corrections, Appellant/cross-respondent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 2014No. 71068-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SCOTT WALTER MAZIAR, DIVISION ONE Respondent/Cross- Appellant, No. 71068-1- m o o PUBLISHED OPINION l\3 _.*>—: -ftr-Of— WASHINGTON STATE 3C DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS O a;r- and the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant/Cross- Respondent. FILED: March 24, 2014 Dwyer, J. — Generally, when a plaintiff brings a maritime claim in state court pursuant to the "saving to suitors" clause,1 article I, section 21 ofthe Washington Constitution2 establishes the parties' rights to a jury trial. That constitutional provision, however, does not grant such a right…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API