Nobis v. Pollock
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Charles T. Nobis sued W. J. Pollock and others to foreclose certain liens Prom a judgment in his favor defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
Upon an examination of the case as presented it appears that there has been no compliance with the provisions of the Code, § 1022, requiring the court, upon a trial of the whole issue of fact, to state separately the facts found and the conclusions of law. The learned court in this case has apparently filed a decision containing certain facts found, and certain conclusions of law. But upon an investigation, in separate parts of the case, we find that he has found other facts apparently upon the request of one of the parties, and has not embraced them in his decision, which is filed. This is…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Livingston v. Manhattan Railway Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
- Elterman v. HymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Baker v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Fox v. McCombNew York Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.