Reynolds v. Munch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Pine- county to' recover possession of a certain tract of land. The case was tried before Crosby, J., who, at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, dismissed the action. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action in ejectment to recover the possession of a. tract of land alleged to be wrongfully withheld by defendants.
The complaint alleges plaintiff’s ownership, and that defendants have no right or interest therein, but nevertheless wrongfully and unlawfully withhold the possession from plaintiff.' Defendant McGrath interposed an answer, in which it is alleged that the lands in controversy lie adjacent to Snake river, in Pine county, this state, and are overflowed by reason of a dam constructed in the river; that the dam was constructed in the year 1849', and has been maintained and used…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Champlain & St. Lawrence Rail Road v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Nichols v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
- Murphy v. BolgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Johnson v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simons v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Simons v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Tew v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Tew v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912