Legal Opinion

United States v. Vernon

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 7, 1986No. 85-3761-CIV-SCOTTPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

SCOTT, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. As a basis for this motion, Defendants argue that the Complaint is defective because Plaintiff has failed to attach all relevant portions of the mortgage which it is forclosing on. Defendants’ position is completely unsupported by either statutory or case authority.

A reading of the plain language of Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(c) indicates that written instruments are not required to be attached to a party’s pleading. Moreover, case law similarly concludes that “the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. GlennDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sprint Solutions, Inc. v. Fils-AmieDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  2. Banco Central Corp. v. Capitol Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  3. Bellitto v. SnipesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  4. Harbaugh v. GreslinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
  5. Fruitstone v. Spartan Race Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API