Legal Opinion

Morigeau v. Lozar

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1928No. 6,214PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

The plaintiff instituted this action to foreclose a deed as a mortgage. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and after the evidence was all submitted by both parties plaintiff and defendant, the court made special findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the plaintiff, upon which judgment of foreclosure was duly entered. The defendant has appealed from the judgment.

Without conflict, it appears that at the date of the execution of the deed the defendant’s mother and father, with whom she then resided, were indebted for merchandise to the Demers Mercantile Company in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McConnell v. BlackleyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Schauer v. MorganMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Harrison v. RiddellMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WashburnMontana Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Surety Life Insurance v. Rose Chapel Mortuary, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Life Benefit, Inc. v. ElfringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Holland Furnace Co. v. RoundsMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Costello v. ShieldsMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. United States v. Willard E. Fraser Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API